Friday, April 24, 2015

Week 2 - evaluation methods

In this week’s blog, I will not only be reflecting upon my progress with concurrent language learning technologies but I will also be providing detailed evaluation in accordance with a ten point checklist proposed by Professor Mike Levy.  While it must be acknowledged that this checklist is not the sole method of evaluation, it does provide a comprehensive list of areas from which any language learning technology or website can be objectively measured.

Technology #1 – Coffee Break French
Coffee Break French has continued to provide an easily accessible podcast which I have generally listened to as part of my daily walk to and from work.  The 10 to 15 minutes of intermediate French are provided in a friendly and supportive manner from the show's host Mark.  His occasional interjections with additional grammar specifics frame the podcast as authentic and real life speech.

1.     Content:
In Lesson 2, we once again meet Katie.  The lesson opens with Katie reading from her journal in which she describes her past week.  The content of the program is approximately 50% in English and the 50% in the target language.  After a complete reading of the journal, the host and narrator, Mark, provides a limited break down of the text.  Many of the specific points are replayed in French and further explained.  At the conclusion of the podcast, Katie presents her text in full once again.

2.     Objectives:
In the free version of the program, there are no specific objectives identified.  It is inferred that comprehension will be improved through accessing the program.  This level is aimed at an intermediate level of French.  The presentation of the text a third time provides an opportunity to confirm what has been heard and understood.

3.     Documentation:
Coffee Break French does not provide any written material when accessing the program on a portable device as a podcast.  It does however off limited written content on its Radiolingua website.  The listener is nevertheless reminded in every episode that a complete copy of the text and additional notes are included if the premium version is purchased.

4.     Instructions:
As the podcast is essentially designed as a listening activity, there are very few instructions with the program.  In some episodes, the listener will be asked a question, followed by a short silence and the provided with a correction and/or explanation from the host.  Generally, I found this to be of little assistance however this was not a technology which I had engaged as an interactive tool.

5.     Student use:
The program is very easy to use and provided the user has access to a suitable device, will be able to listen to the podcasts both on and offline. 

6.     Program response to student:
As mentioned previously, the program affords no interactivity between the tutor and student with the exception of a few rhetorical questions.  I found the technology passive and this would impact students who required more of a wow factor.

7.     Program design:
Radiolingua has established an online presence that provides a similar language learning program in several languages.  It employs the same format for each language.  However it appears to be an evolving program that was originally intended for beginners but how now progressed to higher levels of instruction.  It has also developed an operating platform using Facebook (this would create more interactive participation).

8.     Technical quality:
As an iPhone user, I found the quality of the recordings to be of a high standard, easily obtainable and readily accessible.

9.     Motivational devices:
Personally, I felt that the program failed to offer much from a motivational aspect.  Listening each morning was an easy task as it filled the 15 minutes of my morning commute; however there was no incentive to move forward other than an interest in hearing the stories from the main characters.  

10.  Cultural perspectives:
A key affordance of the podcast is that provides authentic language in an authentic setting (despite the host having a Scottish accent).  The language school where the three protagonists attend is located in Nice and there are descriptions of the area and other cultural aspects including shopping and dining.

Technology #2 – Tex Grammar

1.     Content:
In this week’s activities, I engaged with additional grammar lessons, covering specifically determiners and definite articles.  While the section on determiners provided tutoring only, the section on definite articles afforded instruction, example and practise.  The program also offered limited listening activities to reinforce pronunciation.

2.     Objectives:
As in Coffee Break French there are no set tests or objectives to be achieved, the program does provide some options for self-testing and subsequent feedback.  In these instances, the technology continues to perform as a tutor as opposed to a simple tool.

3.     Documentation:
A print option is available within Tex Grammar which allows each lesson to be printed if required.

4.     Instructions:
The site is easily navigated through a comprehensive index page and allows for simple movement between various parts of the program. 

5.     Student use:
As this is a web based program it is necessary for the student to have access to the internet.  While this is a minor constraint, I believe the program would have greater appeal if it were available as an application that could be downloaded and used offline, incorporating mobile devices.

6.     Program response to student:
Once again, I felt that the program offered only limited interactivity between the tutor and student, albeit to a greater level than that provided by Coffee Break French. However, I have identified in this week’s work that the program links with Facebook and in this arena provides for question and answer forums.  As yet I have not engaged in the forums but have noted this for future study.  I did find that completing the tests was beneficial and seeing an improvement in my responses after taking the tests on a couple of occasions was motivating and satisfying.

7.     Program design and 8.   Technical quality:
Tex Grammar is not a bells and whistles website.  It has a simple format and design.  It provides connectivity with Facebook as well as links to other language assistance sites hosted on the University of Texas website.

9.     Motivational devices:
The program affords little as a motivational tool and as with Coffee Break French, self-discipline and a desire to learn and acquire new skills remains the primary motivation. 

10.  Cultural perspectives:
The program has been developed at the University of Texas and provides no evidence of learning through culture except perhaps reinforcing stereotypes by having its central animated characters of Tammy and Tex wear berets.

The last word
My experience this week has not been as encouraging as I had hoped.  I have found that choosing to listen to the same episode of Coffee Break French each day has become rather tedious and I am contemplating altering my original plan to include additional episodes.

And to wrap up for this week, words of wisdom from Dr Seuss.

 “The more that you read, the more things you will know. The more that you learn, the more places you'll go.”

A plus tard,

Coralee

No comments:

Post a Comment